Should Americans Fear Terrorism (22 views)
From:  David (DavidABrown)    9/23/2003 4:48 pm  
To:  ALL    
 
  703.1  
 
http://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/

II. Americans are living today as "sheeple" who are scared to death! All the phony terror warnings we have been subjected to since 9/11/2001 have turned average Americans into such "scardy cats" that they will prove to be "putty" in the hands of our officials when a real terrorist attack occurs. In NEWS1571 entitled, "Propaganda Principle: Fear of Conflict Is Nearly As Effective As Actual Conflict In Achieving Desired Change", we reminded our readers of the maxim enunciated by Adolf Hitler: "Truth is not what is, truth is what people believe it to be". 

After over 2 years of incessant bogus "terror alerts" , Americans are terrified. Listen:

NEWS BRIEF: "Living in 'apocalyptic fear': Americans more scared than ever", The Toronto Star, September 11, 2003.

"WASHINGTONTwo years on, the shock has dissipated, the memory is more distant, but the fear remains. Poll after poll released on the eve of today's second anniversary of the terrorist strikes on New York and Washington find Americans more fearful and fatalistic than they were a year ago ... The apocalyptic fear is definitely here to stay, at least in the foreseeable future."

A fearful population is a population who can be stampeded by clever officials operating according to a plan extremely well thought out, as the Illuminati plan truly is. This poll demonstrates that, when the time comes to initiate the planned urban terrorist attacks, the American people are ready to be stampeded.

Now that we know the general population is fearful, the time may be at hand to subject them to the most fearsome dictatorial laws since Josef Stalin. Our Attorney General was on the attack again last week, trying to drum up support for these fearful new laws.

III. Attorney General Ashcroft completes his city tour defending the indefensible -- the Patriot Act I and the Absolute Dictatorship it portends. Americans do not know enough to be scared!

Then, Ashcroft goes on the public offense, severely criticizing the critics of his draconian plans. Listen:

NEWS BRIEF: "Ashcroft Rips Anti-Patriot Act 'Hysteria'", ABCNews, September 15, 2003.

"Attorney General John Ashcroft denounced as 'hysteria' the contention by some librarians and civil liberties groups that the FBI can use a new anti-terror law to snoop into Americans' reading habits. In a speech Monday to an American Restaurant Association conference, Ashcroft said people are being wrongly led to believe that libraries have been 'surrounded by the FBI, with agents dressed in raincoats, dark suits and sunglasses. They stop everyone and interrogate everyone like Joe Friday."

By casting the objection against the Library Search provision into the Theater of the Absurd, Ashcroft is convincing the undiscerning that any and all objections to this provision are ridiculous and are not to be taken seriously. 

This article continues:

"A portion of the Patriot Act, passed shortly after the 2001 terror attacks, gives federal authorities access to library, bookstore and other business records as part of terrorism investigations."

You have to give Ashcroft credit: he knows the soft spot of the criticism of Patriot Act I, and it is there he attacks. When he is seen as winning this argument, he is seen as winning the rhetoric battle for these "anti-terrroism" laws as a whole. In other words, by picking on a minor issue to attack, Ashcroft is seeking to permanently deflect all criticism of both Patriot Act I and the even more dictatorial Patriot Act II.

We had better hope that we can get the American people riled up about the more dangerous issues of Patriot Act I, for this extension called Patriot Act II is truly horrendous. As Alex Jones so completely reveals in his new video, "Police State 3: Total Enslavement", Americans will be suffering under dictatorship laws as severe as those of the Russians under Josef Stalin. For example, government agents can come to your home:

* Invade your home without a Judicial Warrant
* Burst into your home and arrest you without any charges
* Whisk you to prison without notifying your family where you are going or what charges are against you
* Deny you any legal representation or a fair public trial
* Sentence you without a fair public trial 
* Execute you without a fair public trial
* Never notify your family or any official as to your death 
* If a bystander or neighbor sees you being arrested, they had better not tell anyone or they can be arrested without charges, or without trial. Further, they would face the same kind of Death Penalty as you have just suffered!
These are the kinds of terrible parts of Patriot Act II that Ashcroft wants no man to understand. Thus, if the Attorney General can carry out a public attack on a minor issue of Patriot I and calm people down, he can then proceed to implement the more dangerous Patriot Act II without severe public scrutiny. Now you know why he chose this minor Library issue against which to attack.

However, an article last week should have served as a wakeup call to all concerned, discerning Americans; government agents are already misusing and abusing some of the "anti-terrorist" laws by using them against ordinary Americans who are clearly not terrorists. Listen:

NEWS BRIEF: "New Terror Laws Used Vs. Common Criminals", by David Caruso, Yahoo News, September 14, 2003.

"PHILADELPHIA - In the two years since law enforcement agencies gained fresh powers to help them track down and punish terrorists, police and prosecutors have increasingly turned the force of the new laws not on al-Qaida cells but on people charged with common crimes ... Civil liberties and legal defense groups are bothered by the string of cases, and say the government soon will be routinely using harsh anti-terrorism laws against run-of-the-mill lawbreakers. "

Now, wait a minute, this was not supposed to have happened!! When President Bush and Attorney General Ashcroft demanded these new laws that trample on American freedoms and liberties and upon our beloved Constitution, they said they needed these extraordinary laws so they could combat those nasty, bloodthirsty Muslim terrorists. We were promised that these laws were necessary to protect American freedoms; at the time, we were arguing that the truth lies in exactly the opposite direction, and that, in the name of protecting our freedoms, the plan is to take them away.

But, you protest, these prosecutions are not aimed at law-abiding Americans, but at the scum of our society. For the moment you are right; however, when we allow American criminals to be attacked and prosecuted by bending or a breaking our Constitutional freedoms, the time will soon arrive when law-abiding Americans will be attacked by these same inquisitorial techniques.

You see, person(s) are identified as criminal by the laws, and the laws are established according to the morals and values of the society. In our society, which has been generally governed by Judeo-Christian values, a criminal is one who murders, who steals, and who ruins the health of other people by drugs and other substances. However, the time is coming when laws will be changed quickly and wholesale, where the old Judeo-Christian values are cast aside, being replaced by Satanic values. Then, devout Christians who were formerly considered to be law-abiding will now be considered criminals. Hitler opened the prison doors shortly after gaining Absolute Dictatorship, because the criminals inside were not considered criminals any longer; but, the law-abiding German citizen whom Hitler thought of as his enemy were now the new criminals. And, Hitler needed the prison space for this new class of "criminal".

Therefore, you cannot relax your vigilance just because the Bush Administration promises that these new laws are only to combat nasty "terrorists"!

Just a few days after the 9/11 attacks, the Bush Administration redefined what a terrorist is. His redefinition meant that honest Christians can now be considered as terrorist. 

Listen:

NEWS BRIEF: "Ridge Vows Balance of Rights, Security", News-Item Newspaper, Shamokin, Pennsylvania, 10/3/01, Page 1. (NOTE: Date highlighted in red so you would take note of just how quickly after the 9/11 attacks the Bush Administration redefined "terrorist")

"To those Americans who would lash out at your fellow citizens, simply because they worship differently, or dress differently, or look differently than you, there is one word for such behavior: terrorism."

[Governor Tom Ridge, in his farewell address to the State Legislature as Pennsylvania Governor, before taking up his new position at the White House as Director of Homeland Security].

The Bush Administration has just redefined who is a terrorist and what a person has to do in order to be classified by the Federal Government as a terrorist. We report this shocking story in detail in NEWS1553, and encourage you to read it carefully, for you might have missed this story in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks.

A few weeks later, we issued another article, NEWS1579, in which we reported that Bush had adopted the Clinton concept of "Domestic Terrorist", thus setting ordinary Americans up for arrest and trial as "terrorists". We urge you to read this insightful article, for you will realize just how much in danger we are at this moment.

Now, let us go back to this Yahoo article to see that the Bush Administration intended from the beginning to push beyond even these unprecedented new laws. You will see the face of an impending dictatorship in this report.

"Within six months of passing the Patriot Act, the Justice Department was conducting seminars on how to stretch the new wiretapping provisions to extend them beyond terror cases," said Dan Dodson, a spokesman for the National Association of Criminal Defense Attorneys. "They say they want the Patriot Act to fight terrorism, then, within six months, they are teaching their people how to use it on ordinary citizens." [Ibid.]

This lying and deliberate misuse of government law enforcement resources is inexcusable! Did you see that the stated target of this breaking of the new rules was "ordinary citizens"? Thus, you know in your inner heart of hearts that the Bush Administration truly is planning to fulfill the most terrible of Illuminist plans to enslave us; once we have been taken down, the rest of the free world can easily be taken down! 

Within six months of getting these new dictatorship laws, the Ashcroft Justice Department began educating its investigators how to stretch their efforts beyond the new laws so they could start using them against ordinary Americans. YOU are the target, just as we have been stating all along.

Americans, are you listening? For that matter, all citizens of all nations who still stage elections are targets as well. Most of these nations have passed laws similar to our Patriot Act I, so you can bet their investigative units were also being trained in seminars how to "extend them beyond terror cases" to ordinary citizens.

But, just when you think the news cannot get any worse, it gets worse! 

Now, we discover that Bush/Ashcroft are declaring American citizens as "enemy combatants"! This unilateral declaration instantly strips the American citizen of all his rights, privileges, and liberties, plus his right to a fair public trial represented by legal counsel and a verdict delivered by a jury of his peers!

Listen:

"Critics also say the government has gone too far in charging three U.S. citizens as enemy combatants, a power presidents wield during wartime that is not part of the Patriot Act. The government can detain such individuals indefinitely without allowing them access to a lawyer ... 'We've already heard stories of local police chiefs creating files on people who have protested the Iraq war ... The government is constantly trying to expand its jurisdictions, and it needs to be watched very, very closely." [Ibid.]

We close this section by offering this "joke" about Ashcroft and his dictatorial Patriot Act II. Unfortunately, this "joke" is likely to come true sooner than you might think.

"Attorney General John Ashcroft was speaking at an elementary school about rights and freedoms in America. 'Any questions,' he asked. A little boy raised his hand. 'My name is Billy, and I have two questions. First, why are you using the Patriot Act to limit American's civil liberties? Second, why haven't any weapons of mass destruction been found in Iraq?' Just then the bell rang, and Ashcroft stated, 'We'll resume after recess.' 

"Recess ended and Ashcroft again asked, 'Are there any questions? A little girl raised her hand. 'My name is Julie, and I have four questions. First, why are you using the Patriot Act to limit American's civil liberties? Second, why haven't any weapons of mass destruction been found in Iraq? Third, why did the recess bell ring ten minutes early?" "Fourth, where's Billy?'" ["Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics", by David R. Hoffman, September 17, 2003]

 

IV. American law may soon declare the Bible to be a "Hate Crimes" book! If you think this statement is too extreme, maybe you just have are not thoroughly appraised of the situation! Even though we are issuing an in-depth report on this issue next week, we shall give you the "barebones" version here. 

First, let us see what the Canadians are in the processing of doing:

NEWS BRIEF: "Canadian House passes gay hate-crimes bill", MSNBC, September 17, 2003.

"OTTAWA  The Canadian House of Commons passed a controversial bill on Wednesday that would make it a crime to incite hatred against homosexuals. Parliament's elected chamber approved it by 141-110, overriding concerns voiced by religious groups that it could put a chill on free speech and could brand the Bible and Koran as hate literature."

Now, the measure goes to the unelected Senate, where passage is probably assured. Then, Canada will have passed a "Hate Crimes" bill so stringent that it will define as a "Hate Crime" anyone who declares that homosexuality is wrong. One does not even have to take any physical action or threaten a physical action to be guilty of a "hate crime". Rather, if a person says or writes that homosexual is wrong, he or she will be guilty of a crime called "hate". Criminal charges and prison time await the convicted.

Further, and here is the huge controversy, even if a person makes this kind of statement because of religious conviction, that person is still guilty of a hate crime! Thus, if a Bible preacher or teacher states that homosexuality is wrong, based on the authority of God's word, he can be arrested and tried for "Hate Crimes". If a Christian ministry -- using whatever medium -- teaches that homosexuality is wrong, that ministry can be legally attacked under the provisions of this new law.

Now, we get to the sticky part of this subject. When this Canadian law officially goes into effect, American ministries and pastors will at risk! How can this be, you ask? In NEWS1836, we alerted to you the reality that the U.S. Supreme Court based its Sodomy decision upon international law, not just on the U.S. Constitution! 

Listen:

NEWS BRIEF: "European Legal Brief Threatened Trouble for US Over Texas Sodomy Law", Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute, July 4, 2003.

"As debate continues on the significance of the US Supreme Court's decision to overturn Texas' law against sodomy, it has gone largely unnoticed that the majority's decision relied on judicial rulings made in Europe and at the United Nations. The pivotal role of international law in the Supreme Court decision seems to confirm the concerns of conservative legal scholars, who have long warned that laws developed in Europe and at the UN could be imposed on the US. The majority opinion was guided, specifically, by the pro-homosexual rulings of the European Court of Human Rights."

Thus, since we know from this Illuminati Card Game that the U.S. Supreme Court is under the firm control of the globalist Illuminati, we can can only expect that a trial case will be speedily brought forward so the Court can rule that anyone who states or writes that homosexuality is wrong will be guilty of "Hate Crime". As in Canada, even if they take this stance based upon religious conviction, they will be charged and found guilty. Our Supreme Court can base their decision on the new Canadian law! 

We are truly in danger.




David A. Brown
Basic Christian: Forum
www.BasicChristian.org

 
From:  David (DavidABrown)    9/23/2003 4:55 pm  
To:  ALL   (2 of 3)  
 
  703.2 in reply to 703.1  
 
Continued ..

You see, person(s) are identified as criminal by the laws, and the laws are established according to the morals and values of the society. In our society, which has been generally governed by Judeo-Christian values, a criminal is one who murders, who steals, and who ruins the health of other people by drugs and other substances. However, the time is coming when laws will be changed quickly and wholesale, where the old Judeo-Christian values are cast aside, being replaced by Satanic values. Then, devout Christians who were formerly considered to be law-abiding will now be considered criminals. Hitler opened the prison doors shortly after gaining Absolute Dictatorship, because the criminals inside were not considered criminals any longer; but, the law-abiding German citizen whom Hitler thought of as his enemy were now the new criminals. And, Hitler needed the prison space for this new class of "criminal".

Therefore, you cannot relax your vigilance just because the Bush Administration promises that these new laws are only to combat nasty "terrorists"!

Just a few days after the 9/11 attacks, the Bush Administration redefined what a terrorist is. His redefinition meant that honest Christians can now be considered as terrorist. 

Listen:

NEWS BRIEF: "Ridge Vows Balance of Rights, Security", News-Item Newspaper, Shamokin, Pennsylvania, 10/3/01, Page 1. (NOTE: Date highlighted in red so you would take note of just how quickly after the 9/11 attacks the Bush Administration redefined "terrorist")

"To those Americans who would lash out at your fellow citizens, simply because they worship differently, or dress differently, or look differently than you, there is one word for such behavior: terrorism."

[Governor Tom Ridge, in his farewell address to the State Legislature as Pennsylvania Governor, before taking up his new position at the White House as Director of Homeland Security].

The Bush Administration has just redefined who is a terrorist and what a person has to do in order to be classified by the Federal Government as a terrorist. We report this shocking story in detail in NEWS1553, and encourage you to read it carefully, for you might have missed this story in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks.

A few weeks later, we issued another article, NEWS1579, in which we reported that Bush had adopted the Clinton concept of "Domestic Terrorist", thus setting ordinary Americans up for arrest and trial as "terrorists". We urge you to read this insightful article, for you will realize just how much in danger we are at this moment.

Now, let us go back to this Yahoo article to see that the Bush Administration intended from the beginning to push beyond even these unprecedented new laws. You will see the face of an impending dictatorship in this report.

"Within six months of passing the Patriot Act, the Justice Department was conducting seminars on how to stretch the new wiretapping provisions to extend them beyond terror cases," said Dan Dodson, a spokesman for the National Association of Criminal Defense Attorneys. "They say they want the Patriot Act to fight terrorism, then, within six months, they are teaching their people how to use it on ordinary citizens." [Ibid.]

This lying and deliberate misuse of government law enforcement resources is inexcusable! Did you see that the stated target of this breaking of the new rules was "ordinary citizens"? Thus, you know in your inner heart of hearts that the Bush Administration truly is planning to fulfill the most terrible of Illuminist plans to enslave us; once we have been taken down, the rest of the free world can easily be taken down! 

Within six months of getting these new dictatorship laws, the Ashcroft Justice Department began educating its investigators how to stretch their efforts beyond the new laws so they could start using them against ordinary Americans. YOU are the target, just as we have been stating all along.

Americans, are you listening? For that matter, all citizens of all nations who still stage elections are targets as well. Most of these nations have passed laws similar to our Patriot Act I, so you can bet their investigative units were also being trained in seminars how to "extend them beyond terror cases" to ordinary citizens.

But, just when you think the news cannot get any worse, it gets worse! 

Now, we discover that Bush/Ashcroft are declaring American citizens as "enemy combatants"! This unilateral declaration instantly strips the American citizen of all his rights, privileges, and liberties, plus his right to a fair public trial represented by legal counsel and a verdict delivered by a jury of his peers!

Listen:

"Critics also say the government has gone too far in charging three U.S. citizens as enemy combatants, a power presidents wield during wartime that is not part of the Patriot Act. The government can detain such individuals indefinitely without allowing them access to a lawyer ... 'We've already heard stories of local police chiefs creating files on people who have protested the Iraq war ... The government is constantly trying to expand its jurisdictions, and it needs to be watched very, very closely." [Ibid.]

We close this section by offering this "joke" about Ashcroft and his dictatorial Patriot Act II. Unfortunately, this "joke" is likely to come true sooner than you might think.

"Attorney General John Ashcroft was speaking at an elementary school about rights and freedoms in America. 'Any questions,' he asked. A little boy raised his hand. 'My name is Billy, and I have two questions. First, why are you using the Patriot Act to limit American's civil liberties? Second, why haven't any weapons of mass destruction been found in Iraq?' Just then the bell rang, and Ashcroft stated, 'We'll resume after recess.' 

"Recess ended and Ashcroft again asked, 'Are there any questions? A little girl raised her hand. 'My name is Julie, and I have four questions. First, why are you using the Patriot Act to limit American's civil liberties? Second, why haven't any weapons of mass destruction been found in Iraq? Third, why did the recess bell ring ten minutes early?" "Fourth, where's Billy?'" ["Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics", by David R. Hoffman, September 17, 2003]

 IV. American law may soon declare the Bible to be a "Hate Crimes" book! If you think this statement is too extreme, maybe you just have are not thoroughly appraised of the situation! Even though we are issuing an in-depth report on this issue next week, we shall give you the "barebones" version here. 

First, let us see what the Canadians are in the processing of doing:

NEWS BRIEF: "Canadian House passes gay hate-crimes bill", MSNBC, September 17, 2003.

"OTTAWA  The Canadian House of Commons passed a controversial bill on Wednesday that would make it a crime to incite hatred against homosexuals. Parliament's elected chamber approved it by 141-110, overriding concerns voiced by religious groups that it could put a chill on free speech and cou ...[Message truncated] 
 
View Full Message 
  
   Options  Reply Delete Edit   
Rate 
  
    
 


   From:  David (DavidABrown)    9/23/2003 5:00 pm  
To:  ALL   (3 of 3)  
 
  703.3 in reply to 703.2  
 
Continued ...

First, let us see what the Canadians are in the processing of doing:

NEWS BRIEF: "Canadian House passes gay hate-crimes bill", MSNBC, September 17, 2003.

"OTTAWA  The Canadian House of Commons passed a controversial bill on Wednesday that would make it a crime to incite hatred against homosexuals. Parliament's elected chamber approved it by 141-110, overriding concerns voiced by religious groups that it could put a chill on free speech and could brand the Bible and Koran as hate literature."

Now, the measure goes to the unelected Senate, where passage is probably assured. Then, Canada will have passed a "Hate Crimes" bill so stringent that it will define as a "Hate Crime" anyone who declares that homosexuality is wrong. One does not even have to take any physical action or threaten a physical action to be guilty of a "hate crime". Rather, if a person says or writes that homosexual is wrong, he or she will be guilty of a crime called "hate". Criminal charges and prison time await the convicted.

Further, and here is the huge controversy, even if a person makes this kind of statement because of religious conviction, that person is still guilty of a hate crime! Thus, if a Bible preacher or teacher states that homosexuality is wrong, based on the authority of God's word, he can be arrested and tried for "Hate Crimes". If a Christian ministry -- using whatever medium -- teaches that homosexuality is wrong, that ministry can be legally attacked under the provisions of this new law.

Now, we get to the sticky part of this subject. When this Canadian law officially goes into effect, American ministries and pastors will at risk! How can this be, you ask? In NEWS1836, we alerted to you the reality that the U.S. Supreme Court based its Sodomy decision upon international law, not just on the U.S. Constitution! 

Listen:

NEWS BRIEF: "European Legal Brief Threatened Trouble for US Over Texas Sodomy Law", Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute, July 4, 2003.

"As debate continues on the significance of the US Supreme Court's decision to overturn Texas' law against sodomy, it has gone largely unnoticed that the majority's decision relied on judicial rulings made in Europe and at the United Nations. The pivotal role of international law in the Supreme Court decision seems to confirm the concerns of conservative legal scholars, who have long warned that laws developed in Europe and at the UN could be imposed on the US. The majority opinion was guided, specifically, by the pro-homosexual rulings of the European Court of Human Rights."

Thus, since we know from this Illuminati Card Game that the U.S. Supreme Court is under the firm control of the globalist Illuminati, we can can only expect that a trial case will be speedily brought forward so the Court can rule that anyone who states or writes that homosexuality is wrong will be guilty of "Hate Crime". As in Canada, even if they take this stance based upon religious conviction, they will be charged and found guilty. Our Supreme Court can base their decision on the new Canadian law! 

We are truly in danger.




David A. Brown
Basic Christian: Forum
www.BasicChristian.org

 
  
   Options  Reply Delete Edit   
Rate 
  
    
 
